티스토리 뷰

Here I am going to introduce some easy results on some criteria for interchanging the order of integration which are not covered by the classical Fubini theorem. Though both statements and proofs are weak and easy, it often reduces our burden to large extent.

 

Let f be a locally integrable function on (0,). That is, f is a measurable function which is integrable on any compact subset K(0,). We say that f has an antiderivative vanishing at the origin if there exists a continuous function F on [0,) such that F(0)=0 and

abf(t)dt=F(b)F(a)

holds for any 0<a<b<. Then the Lebesgue differentiation theorem shows that F is differentiable a.e. with F=f. We will use the notations

f(1),D1f,

to denote F. Since any continuous function on [0,) has an antiderivative vanishing at 0 by the fundamental theorem of calculus, we can inductively define

f(n1)(x):=0xf(n)(t)dt,n1.

Any function that appears in the sequel will be considered to be locally integrable unless stated otherwise.

 

Theorem 1. Suppose that f has an antiderivative vanishing at the origin and that there exists α>0 such that

 

1. xαf(1)(x)0 as x0+ and x, and

2. 0xαn|f(n)(x)|dx< for some nN.

 

Then the integral 0xαf(x)dx exists (as in improper sense) and the following identity holds.

(1)0f(x)xαdx=0sα1Γ(α)0f(x)esxdxds

 

Proof. Applying the L'hospital's rule to the condition 1, we find that for any k0 we have

f(k1)(x)xα+k0,as  x0+  and  x.

So taking the limit (a,b)(0,) to the integration by parts formula

abf(x)xαdx=k=0n1Γ(α+k)Γ(α)[f(k1)(x)xα+k]ab+Γ(α+n)Γ(α)abf(n)(x)xα+ndx,

we confirm that 0xαf(x)dx exists at least as an improper integral and the identity

0f(x)xαdx=Γ(α+n)Γ(α)0f(n)(x)xα+ndx

holds. But by assumption,

00sα+n1|f(n)(x)|exsdsdx=0Γ(α+n)xα+n|f(n)(x)|dx<

by Fubini's theorem, we can interchange the order of integration to obtain

0f(x)xαdx=00sα+n1Γ(α)f(n)(x)exsdsdx=0sα+n1Γ(α)(0f(n)(x)esxdx)ds.

Here, it is easy to confirm that the inner integral 0f(n)(x)esxdx is integrable for any s>0. Thus by taking the limit to the integration by part formula

abf(x)esxdx=k=0n1sk[f(k1)(x)esx]ab+snabf(n)(x)esxdx,

we check that

0f(x)esxdx=sn0f(n)(x)esxdx.

Therefore putting the results together, we obtain the desired conclusion (1).

 

Note that, slightly modifying the proof and replacing the role of Fubini's theorem by the Tonelli's theorem, the condition 2 can be replaced by

 

f(n)0 for some nN.

 

The theorem above assumes some decaying behavior of f. But in some practical uses, this condition automatically follows and hence need not be checked. The following corollaries discusses the circumstances where it is the case.

 

Lemma 2. Assume there exists α>0 such that 0xαf(x)dx exists as in improper sense. Then f has an antiderivative vanishing at the origin and the condition 1 of the Theorem #.

 

Proof. Let g(x)=xαf(x). Then the condition of the lemma shows that g is locally integrable and

lima0+babg(t)dtconverges.

If we put G(x)=1xg(t)dt, then it implies that G(x) converges as either x0+ or x. Thus by letting G~(x)=G(x)G(0+), it immediately follows that G~ is an antiderivative of g vanishing at the origin.

 

Now let F(x)=xαg(1)(x)α0xtα1g(1)(t)dt. Since tα1 is integrable near t=0 and g(1)(t) is continuous, F(x) is a well-defined continuous function such that F(x)0 as x. Moreover, it is easy to check that F(x)=f(x) a.e. This implies that f has the antiderivative vanishing at the origin and f(1)=F.

 

Finally, it remains to show that f(1) satisfies the condition 1 of the Theorem 1. But this is a direct consequence of the L'hospital's rule applied to F(x). Therefore the proof is complete.

 

As a corollary, we obtain the following statement.

 

Corollary 3. Assume there exists α>0 such that

 

1. 0xαf(x)dx exists as in improper sense and

2. 0xαn|f(n)(x)|dx< for some nN.

 

Then (1) holds. Also, the condition 2 can be replaced by the following one:

 

f(n)0 for some nN.

 

Remark. In the previous posting, we showed that the condition 2 of Corollary 3 is unnecessary if α is a positive integer.

 

Now we consider some easy applications.

 

Example 4. Let α(0,2) and consider the integral

0sinxxαdx.

It is easy to check that this integral exists as in improper sense. Also, the antiderivative of sinx is 1cosx, which vanishes at 0 and is non-negative. Thus by the Corollary 3,

0sinxxαdx=1Γ(α)0sα1(0sinxesxdx)ds=1Γ(α)0sα1s2+1ds

Plugging s=tanθ and applying the beta function identity and the Euler's reflection formula, we obtain

0sinxxαdx=π2Γ(α)csc(πα2).

 

 

 

댓글
공지사항
최근에 올라온 글
최근에 달린 댓글
Total
Today
Yesterday
«   2025/04   »
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
글 보관함